Did You Know: The first earmark ever requested was vetoed.

That’s right. The first earmark ever requested was vetoed by President James Madison, who called the spending unconstitutional.

Jim Cox writes:

The first known Member of Congress to write a bill specifically requesting an appropriation of funds for a specific project was Congressman John C. Calhoun of South Carolina (7th Vice President of the United States) who requested funds in 1817 under the Bonus Bill for “internal improvements.” Those improvements were to build roads to connect the East and South with the American Frontier. President James Madison vetoed the bill stating:

“Having considered the bill … I am constrained by the insuperable difficulty I feel in reconciling this bill with the Constitution of the United States. … The legislative powers vested in Congress are specified … in the … Constitution, and it does not appear that the power proposed to be exercised by the bill is among the enumerated powers. …”

You can learn more by downloading the document, “How 20th Century Politicians Made Earmarking Constitutional.” We’ve also made it available in our Recommended Reading section, so it is available as a resource to all who visit our website in the future. Thank you to author Jim Cox for sharing it with us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Community Blog Posts

Posts by date

Posts by category

TAXPAYERS CONNECTED:

Top News

  • Cardinals say ban on earmarks is not forever


    , The Hill

    Three Republican cardinals on the House Appropriations Committee say they view the ban on earmarks as temporary and that lawmakers should retain the right to direct spending to their districts. Read

  • 'Earmarks' to nowhere: States losing billions


    , USA Today

    During the past 20 years, orphan earmarks reduced the amount of money that states would have received in federal highway funding by about $7.5 billion, USA TODAY found. That's $7.5 billion that states could have used to replace obsolete bridges, repair aging roads and bring jobs to rural areas. Read

  • Dick Durbin: Bills with earmarks won’t make it


    , Politico

    The Senate’s No. 2 Democrat told reporters that there aren’t 60 votes in the Senate right now for spending bills that include earmarks – given the increased ranks of the 47-member Senate GOP, which killed an earmark-filled omnibus spending bill last month and vowed to swear off the pet initiatives over the next two years. Read

Blog

Taxpayers Connected:

Our national debt is  
$ 00 00 , 000 000 , 000 000 , 000 000 , 000 000
and each American Taxpayer owes $119,236 of it.